|
Puerto Rico Update,
August 2000 "The Last Drop"* Report of the International Delegation for Demilitarization and Economic Conversion of Military Bases
August 12-20, 2000 - "Paz para Vieques," the plea of Viequenses and human rights advocates around the globe, was the rallying cry which drew fifteen activists to participate in an International Delegation for Demilitarization in Puerto Rico, August 12 to 20, 2000. The delegates were united in their desire to learn about the situation in Vieques, to stand in solidarity with Viequenses suffering from the militarization of their island, to share any useful knowledge or experience they might have, and, finally, to bring the story of Vieques back to their home communities. The delegation was coordinated by the Fellowship of Reconciliation (FOR) and the Caribbean Project for Justice and Peace, and co-sponsored by the American Friends Service Committee. Vieques is a beautiful island-municipality, located six miles to the southeast of the main island of Puerto Rico. Eighteen miles long and 3.5 miles wide, it is home to 9,300 people known as Viequenses. The U.S. Navy and other military forces have used the eastern end of Vieques since 1941 to bomb, test weapons and train troops for U.S. military interventions from the Bay of Pigs to Iraq. The Navy uses 8,000 acres on the western side of the island to store munitions and for the newly installed and widely-opposed ROTHR radar system, leaving Viequenses to live on 8,000 acres in the middle third of the island. Training on Vieques has included the use of napalm and the illegal firing of depleted uranium, facts conceded by the Navy after repeated denials that they were true. Viequenses have a long history of resistance to this occupation. But after a Marine pilot missed his target and hit an observation post in April 1999, killing a local civilian guard and injuring four others, Puerto Rico experienced a kind of nonviolent insurgency. Viequenses and others peacefully occupied the Navy firing range for more than a year, building houses, chapels and schools and effectively preventing the Navy from bombing. Instead, it conducted training operations in Florida, North Carolina and Scotland. Our delegation visited Vieques and Puerto Rico at a critical moment. In May, the civil disobedience camps in Vieques were evicted, with federal agents removing more than 200 protesters, including fishermen, teachers, students, bishops, Congressional Representatives, and Puerto Rican legislators and mayors. In the following months, more than 500 more people committed civil disobedience and were arrested on the Navy-controlled lands in Vieques. A church-led survey of more than 2000 Vieques residents in June showed that 88.5% want the Navy to end bombing on the island immediately. In the face of this overwhelming popular sentiment, the Navy has responded with renewed bombing -- which the delegation heard during our stay there -- as well as propaganda aimed at discrediting their opponents and winning the referendum on the Navy's presence, expected in 2001. The Puerto Rican government has cooperated with the Navy by installing a dramatically increased presence of anti-riot police in Vieques, contributing to an intense polarization of the conflict. The International Delegation met with government officials, including: representatives of the U.S. Navy; the Commissioner of Vieques and the mayors of Vieques and Ceiba; with experts in the fields of environmental pollution and public health; with fishermen from Vieques, Ceiba, Fajardo and Naguabo; and with members of a variety of religious, civic, and human rights organizations. These individuals presented a wealth of information and shared their perspectives on many issues. Two activities of the international delegation were of particular significance. One was a heavily attended five-hour public hearing on a Land Use Plan for Vieques. This hearing was billed as the "final" hearing to approve the plan. But, despite a presidential directive which allows Viequenses to order the removal of the Navy entirely by 2003, this Land Use Plan aims to "incorporate the U.S. Navy into the municipality's plans for growth and physical and economic redevelopment," in the Plan's own words. It made no reference to cleanup of contamination, nor to future land uses of the eastern end of the island where bombing now takes place, nor to the proposals made by Viequenses themselves for future uses. Dozens of attendees spoke against the plan. Outside the municipal building where the hearing was held, a large crowd gathered in nonviolent protest. One middle-aged man walked within the circling picket line, proudly carrying a Puerto Rican flag. His three children, one just a few inches shorter than the next, walked behind him eagerly chanting for an end to the bombing. Behind them followed two middle-aged women with a banner that read "El Pueblo NO se vende" (The People are NOT for sale). Dozens and dozens of other citizens picketed with them. At the end of the evening Vieques' Mayor Manuela Santiago made a surprise announcement that she would draw up a new plan, which will exclude the Navy. The tabling of the plan was a victory for the organized opposition even though the Mayor is a "lame duck" who leaves office in January. Also extremely significant to delegation members was a community meeting held at the Vieques' Museum of History. During the course of the meeting many Viequenses gave their testimony, which were both very enlightening and extremely moving. In unforgettable detail, they personalized the realities of land expropriations, military occupation, environmental contamination and the resulting suffering of the people. Delegates also witnessed a massive vigil outside the federal prison where twenty peace activists who had entered the Vieques firing range were being held. These events left no question about the unified determination of Viequenses to halt all military action on Vieques and to rid the island of military presence. Who We Are
The delegates from Panama, Ecuador and Korea also brought exceptionally valuable experience to the delegation. The delegate from Panama is the director of a human rights group focused on the effects of the now closed U.S. military firing ranges in Panama. The delegate from Ecuador is the director of a human rights group focused on the new U.S. base in Manta, Ecuador. The young delegate from South Korea is a member of Green Korea United, a group intent on closing the U.S. bombing range in Mae-hyang-ri, South Korea. Other members of the delegation included two young Puerto Rican activists from the New York area, a couple from Miami involved in efforts to close the U.S. Army School of the Americas, and a young woman from an intentional peace community in Troy, New York. The Navy's Impact on the Environment and Health Nearly half of Vieques residents are contaminated with mercury, other researchers found in a June 2000 study. They also found that 13% of those tested were contaminated with lead, and 4 percent with cadmium. A study for the period from 1985 to 1989 showed that Viequenses had a rate of cancer 26.9% higher than the rest of Puerto Rico.
Many people believe that at least some of these effects on health come through dispersion of contaminated dust from the eastern bombing area to the populated center of the island. Prevailing winds on Vieques go from east to west. Studies of soil in the impact area, carried out by Jorge Fernández Porto, Lirio Marquez and other researchers when the Navy had ceased bombing between April 1999 and May 2000, show high levels of arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, tin, vanadium, zinc, and cyanide. Munitions used by U.S. and NATO forces in Vieques contain many of the same heavy metals. International law requires that "nations have the responsibility of ensuring that their activities do not cause damage to the environment of other nations." (Principle 21 of the 1972 Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment) History shows and professional research confirms that the United States has failed and continues to fail to fulfill this responsibility in Vieques.
In 1999, the International Grassroots Summit for United States Military Base Cleanup drew up an Environmental Bill of Rights, a detailed set of guidelines considered fundamental for the cleanup and preservation of the environment and ratified by participating representatives from 12 countries. Such guidelines contrast sharply with current US military policy overseas, including Puerto Rico. Ultimately, it is this U.S. military policy deficiency that makes possible the devastation of the environment and the widespread destructive effects on the island's population of over fifty years of bombing. The Navy's Impact on Vieques' Youth and Families As Yabureibo was speaking, a Navy ship dropped several bombs, making a boom that echoed off the distant shoreline of a beach within Camp Garcia. "That's nothing," Yabureibo said. "When other areas are bombed you can feel the ground shake." Though the bombing in August was limited, a June 25 Associated Press report confirms such allegations. The report cited 32-year-old painter Sandra Reyes, who lives in sight of the range, and whose children "came running into the house screaming after the start of the exercises." "My house is shaking, the doors, shake, things on the table shake, my ear drums hurt," Reyes said. "We all feel very frustrated, impotent, violated and harassed." It is not, however, just the Navy's presence that affects the youth of Vieques, but the 24 hour, 7 days a week occupation by a Puerto Rican police force whose job is to act as a human barrier. The police patrol the entrance of Camp Garcia, closely police all protests (such as the Land Use Plan hearing), and serve as escorts for military vehicles that often travel on municipal roads. Their presence, largely unwelcome by the Viequenses, has resulted in an atmosphere of tension that often culminates in the use of unnecessary force against civilians, particularly young males. This, according to Yabureibo, is another one of the effects of the Navy's continued use of Vieques as a training facility.
We met with a wide range of Viequenses who came to a public meeting at El Fortin - Vieques' Museum of History (see sidebar). Among them was 73-year-old Pablo Hernández López, a veteran of the Korean War, whose family was evicted from their home on the western end of the island in June 1943; he was then only 16 years old. I had learned about Don Pablo when a portrait of him holding that same expropriation notice appeared on the news page of a popular internet search engine just days before the May 4 arrests. "You will be required to vacate this property within the next ten days... the house and land which you occupy... was acquired by the United States under judgement of the Federal Court... " read the notice. Several of Don Pablo's family members have already died of cancer, and he now has a scar running down from his chest to his abdominal area resulting from an operation to remove a cancerous tumor in his body. The Presidential Directives and the Navy's Public Relations Offensive The directives called for an appropriation of $40 million to the municipality of Vieques once bombing resumed. They established a referendum in Vieques, on a date to be set by the Navy, the terms of which were: a) the Navy to leave in 2003, and minimal cleanup of the contaminated lands, or b) the Navy to stay indefinitely and train using live fire, in which case the White House would seek $50 million more for Vieques. In either case, the Navy is to limit itself to using "inert" weapons before the referendum, which can be held anytime between August 2000 and February 2002. The directives also called for transfer of 8,000 acres of lands occupied by the Navy on the western end of Vieques to Puerto Rico by December 31, 2000. The directives are administrative, without the force of law, and can be changed by future legislation or directives. The international delegation sought a meeting with Admiral Kevin Green, charged with overseeing Navy forces in Puerto Rico and the rest of Latin America. Admiral Green has been a frequent commentator in the Puerto Rican press, openly advocating the Navy's interests to readers of the San Juan Star. We believed that a group with such diverse and extensive experience in dealing with the cleanup and conversion of U.S. naval bases would have something meaningful to contribute to Admiral Green's understanding, and that the Navy's perspective was vital to our own understanding. For several weeks after requesting a meeting we heard nothing. When delegation organizers called the Navy's public affairs officer, Lt. Jeff Gordon asked "what do we get out of a meeting?" As the international delegation arrived in Puerto Rico, the delegation organizers made our invitation to Admiral Green public, and on the next weekday, the Navy's public relations consultant, Tom Burgess, returned our call. We met with Burgess; his assistant; Navy attorney Lt. Commander Mark Hunzecker; and José Negrón, a Puerto Rican civilian who serves as Admiral Green's senior environmental advisor. Burgess, who runs a public relations outfit based in Virginia called Blue Stone Communications, was hired by Admiral Green in June 2000, after local Puerto Rican public relations firms declined to represent the Navy. It was clear from our meeting with these personnel that the Navy is focusing all its public efforts on winning the referendum that will take place in Vieques. His firm is conducting a series of seven surveys of Vieques residents about their priorities for economic development. This presumably will shape how the Navy spends the $40 million appropriated by Congress before the referendum. Except for Negrón, Navy officials showed scant knowledge of environmental laws and standards for cleaning up munitions and ranges. If the transfer of the western end of Vieques serves as a model for what happens on the impact area of the eastern end, it is a mixed prospect. According to Negrón, the Navy will erect fences and keep custody of the lands that are contaminated in NASD -- identified as 400 acres that include unexploded ordnance from an old dump used for detonating dud munitions. The Navy's public relations campaign has intensified, and is using "hot language," in Burgess' words. Shortly before our meeting with Navy officials, U.S. Navy South spokesman Lt. Jeff Gordon unaccountably called those committing civil disobedience in Vieques a "band of thugs." In the eastern town of Fajardo, we came across a pair of newsletters called Orientador Viequense: Viequenses Pro-Marina. The unsigned newsletter featured acrimonious attacks on Independence Party president Rubén Berríos and asked why a group of medical doctors had committed civil disobedience in Vieques. Wouldn't it have been better if they had come to offer their service to the people of Vieques? the newsletter asked. Coincidentally, during our meeting with Navy officials, they asked almost exactly the same question about the disobedient doctors. We then pulled out the newsletter, remarked on the similarity, and asked if they knew who published it. The Navy spokesman's face dropped. In fact, Lt. Gordon told a U.S. delegation of Christian Peacemaker Teams in March 2000 that the Navy had $80 million in Navy funds available to it -- apart from the $40 million appropriated by Congress -- to win the referendum. On Maria Ortiz Hill: Commissioner of Vieques Under an executive order issued on May 11, 1999, Puerto Rican Governor Rosselló named a Special Commission for Vieques responsible for issuing a report on the living conditions, and a list of recommendations and strategies addressing those issues. This commission's final report to the Governor on June 25, 1999 discussed the impact of military operations on Vieques. The document's recommendations, adopted by the Governor, represented Puerto Rico's official position regarding the Navy in Vieques. (see below)
The Special Commission recommended: the immediate and permanent end to all Navy activities on the island of Vieques; the transfer of lands held by the Navy to Vieques; creation of a task force to promote Puerto Rico's position on Vieques among civil society; that Vieques' people develop a land use policy, including a conservation plan and emphasis on the fishing industry; and holding the Navy responsible for cleanup of lands and waters contaminated with explosives, among other goals. It also called for the establishment of a Vieques Commissioner to carry out this official policy. The law that created the Commissioner's office requires her to ensure that all the governmental bodies involved in the Vieques conflict implement the recommendations and strategies outlined by the first Special Commission for Vieques. The Commissioner is responsible for keeping the municipality of Vieques informed about the progress made by government agencies in implementing these recommendations. In addition to this intermediary role, the Commissioner is responsible for gathering from public and private sectors all information regarding Vieques in one centralized location, and ensuring that studies regarding health, environmental, and socioeconomic development are being conducted. On the evening of the Land Use hearings of the western territory of Vieques on August 15, Maria Ortiz Hill, hurried out of the municipal building escorted by a force of police in riot gear under a clamor of insults hurled at her by the protestors outside of the building. Puerto Rico's Natural Resources Secretary Daniel Pagan, who declared his total support for the land use plan, was also booed as he left the hearing. Much of the resentment from the crowd stemmed from the fact that Ms. Ortiz Hill has no experience of Vieques. She is viewed as an outsider who is not in a good position to represent the voice of the people in Vieques. From the people's perspective, after much distrust and frustration with the bureaucracy of Puerto Rican government, she is perceived as another puppet. During our visit to her office, Commissioner Ortiz Hill stressed that she does not see herself as a spokesperson for Vieques or for the government, but rather as a coordinator. Ms. Ortiz Hill subsequently emphasized in an interview with El Nuevo Dia that her position regarding the referendum is neutral, and though this position might be difficult for the people of Vieques to accept, she argued that it would be in their best interest for resolving the conflict in Vieques. More disturbing was her claim that she has been the subject of a death threat from an individual in Vieques, and that this was why she was reluctant to address the people of Vieques directly. Consequently, because of her stated "neutrality" on the Navy's presence in Vieques and her lack of communication with the people, her relationship with them is tense. When she told us of the threat against her, we urged the Commissioner to denounce it publicly, which she later did. Throughout her account of her experience working on Vieques, it became clear that there was a severe lack of communication between her office and the people of Vieques. Some grassroots organizations in Vieques told us that she had declined to meet with them, and when we asked her about this allegation, she assured us that she was planning to visit Vieques and spend more time talking to its residents and meeting with diverse community groups. It is moreover important to consider her publicly expressed position as "neutral." We ask: How can someone whose mission is to ensure implementation of the recommendations of the first Special Commission ever be neutral in the conflict of Vieques? One of the report's first recommendations is the permanent cessation of the bombing, yet although Ms Ortiz is mandated to ensure that such a recommendation is implemented, she has supported the presidential directives which allow for bombing at the very least until 2003. The only way forward for Maria Ortiz Hill is that, she, as the commissioner of Vieques promote Puerto Rico's democratic consensus as represented by the Vieques Special Commission. If she does so, she will work for the total cessation of Navy activities on Vieques, and she will not feel threatened by the people whose interests she presumably represents. If she in fact supports the Navy's argument to remain in Vieques, then she is morally obliged to resign from her position, and turn over the post to someone who will ensure that the recommendations and strategies of the first Special Commission be implemented as public policy in Vieques. Recommendations of the Special Commission on Vieques
This report was unanimously approved by the members of the Special Commission on Vieques in San Juan, Puerto Rico, on June 25, 1999. (Norma Burgós, President; Charlie Rodríguez; Aníbal Acevedo Vilá; Víctor García-San Inocencio; Carlos Ventura; Manuela Santiago; Sila Calderón; Mario Gaztambide; Roberto González) The Impact of Roosevelt Roads Naval Station
Five hundred Ceiba residents, of a population of 19,000, are employed on the Navy base -- out of a civilian work force of about three thousand. Because of income from the Navy base, the town does not qualify for funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. But a house that rents in nearby Fajardo for $450, according to Mayor Cruz, rents in Ceiba for $650 because it can be rented so easily to the Navy. Moreover, despite a Puerto Rican law that requires that the public have access to all beach, Ceiba is the only coastal municipality in Puerto Rico that has no civilian access to beaches, because the beaches are all controlled by the Navy. If the Roosevelt Roads base were ever closed, as Senator Inhofe has threatened in the case of closure of the range in Vieques, Ceiba could develop the port to compete with Fajardo's port and ferry. "The Navy has retarded our socioeconomic development," Mayor Cruz told us. "If it closes, bienvenido. We won't die of hunger."
Fishermen from Ceiba and Fajardo painted for us an even more dire picture of the Navy's impact on their lives and work. When bombing occurred in the waters of nearby Culebra -- until 1975 another naval bombing range -- fishermen were often in the areas during bombing. If they ignored the Navy's warnings, the Navy would bomb close to them to scare them. Bombs killed many fish, said Miguel 'Chan' Davila. Another fisherman, Hilario Goméz Cintrón, whose home and animals in western Vieques was 'expropriated' by the Navy for twenty dollars in the 1940s, said that fish with abnormalities have increased over the years.
As I reflect on my trip to Vieques, Puerto Rico, I can't help seeing the similarities of the struggle the people of Hunters Point and the people of Vieques have on their hands. The Navy is misleading all of us by hiding behind the process to get funding and approval for their cleanup projects. For instance, in Bayview Hunters Point of San Francisco, the Navy is telling us "we will give the City of San Francisco property that you can develop but just let us leave our waste in your community Superfund site. We will cap the site until 2025, then -- maybe -- we will clean it up." Doesn't that sound a lot like what they are telling the people of Vieques? "We will give you the west side of Vieques but you must leave us on the East side so we can keep up our bombing practice. And not only us, but for all of our allies." The Navy's botched cleanup projects have resulted in a shocking misuse of funds. For example, after 12 years of alleged studies and cleanup activities and $162 million spent, Hunters Point Shipyard remains as contaminated as it was when the Navy closed it down in 1974. In September 1999, an uncontrollable underground fire proved the Navy's failure. With the Navy's misuse of funds and their lack of know-how, the people have had to demand the right to clean up their own neighborhood. We in the Hunters Point community are telling the EPA that our property must be cleaned up to the same standards that other communities receive, not to the standard the Navy sets. EPA standards say that the cleanup must be carried out before development of the property can occur, which is what happened in the Army's Presidio, located in the most affluent -- and coincidentally most Anglo -- area of San Francisco. So why is it that on our side of town has the EPA adopted the Navy's plan of leaving the contaminants in place to kill our people? The Navy's (and military's) job is to kill. They not only kill the enemy, but they are also killing the civilian population by leaving the land contaminated with waste from their war by-products. So how can we the people leave the cleanup to them, an organization whose main directive is to kill? It is up to us, the community, to clean up the contaminated sites left in our backyards. The Navy is not willing to live up to what the communities are saying. Instead they have produced their own standards for cleanup, all over the world, to leave the contaminants in place. Not only in Hunters Point, but also in Vieques, Hawai'i, Korea and Panama. The reason for this is racism -- we are all people of color, so why do they care? -Olin Webb, Hunters Point community leader and Vietnam War veteran Whose Security? In July 2000, the United Nations Committee on Decolonization issued a resolution recognizing Puerto Rico's status as a colony and calling on the United States to end its military training in Vieques, end its actions against peaceful demonstrators, and clean up the land and return it to Vieques. It was the first time in 28 years that the committee approved a resolution on Puerto Rico by consensus. Moreover, the United Nations condemns colonial rule, to which Vieques is subject, as "a threat to international peace and security" (General Assembly Resolution, Dec. 13, 1966). Faced with this threat, the people of Vieques have taken up a proportionate means of self-defense: nonviolent civil disobedience -- or evangelical obedience. In this International Year of the Culture of Peace, Vieques offers the world a lesson in unity and consensus in their struggle to defend human security. Conclusions "Once the Navy leaves Vieques, the United States will be a better
nation, and the world will be a better world." "The situation in Vieques is a clear example of environmental racism."
Recommendations The International Delegation for Demilitarization urges:
Delegation Participants
This report was written by Nancy Bennett, Henry Clark, Wanda Colón Cortez, Jorge José Delgado, Yujin Lee, John Lindsay-Poland, Phoebe McDowell, Mariza Rosado, Olin Webb and LaDonna Williams. The organizations and individuals who participated in the delegation express our gratitude to the American Friends Service Committee, Donald Irish and many other individuals for financial assistance that made possible the delegation and the production of this report.
Resources For more information, contact the following organizations:
Web Sites
* When Navy bombs killed David Sanes, a local civilian guard, in April 1999, it was "the last drop that made the cup run over," catalyzing resistance to the Navy's operations, according to Rev. Wilfredo Estrada. The phrase also reminds us that water, so necessary for life, is often fouled by careless behavior. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fellowship of Reconciliation ©2001 Fellowship of Reconciliation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||