Statements from Religious Leaders about Iraq
(provided
by Lutheran Peace Fellowship)
Also
view these links to other statements on the web
Catholic
We respectfully urge you to step back
from the brink of war and help lead the world to act together to fashion an effective
global response to Iraq's threats that conforms with traditional moral limits
on the use of military force. US Conference of Catholic Bishops, Letter to President
Bush, Sept. 13, 2002
Episcopalian
The question for us now must be: what is our role in the community of nations?
I believe we have the capacity within us to help lead our world into the way of
justness and peace. The freedoms we enjoy as citizens of the United States oblige
us to attend not only to our own welfare, but to the well-being of the world around
us. A superpower, especially one that declares itself to be "under God,"
must exercise the role of super servant. Our nation has an opportunity to reflect
the values and ideals that we espouse by focusing upon issues of poverty, disease
and despair, not only within our own nation but throughout the global community
of which we are a part. The Presiding Bishop's statement on military action against
Iraq, September 6, 2002
Jewish
International
cooperation is far, far better than unilateral action, and the U.S. must explore
all reasonable means of attaining such support. Non-military action is always
preferable to military action, and the U.S. must fully explore all options to
resolve the situation through such means. If the effort to obtain international
cooperation and support through the United Nations fails, the U.S. must work with
other nations to obtain cooperation in any military action. Union of American
Hebrew Congregations, Executive Committee Decision on Unilateral Action by the
U.S. Against Iraq
Lutheran
While we are fully aware of the potential threat posed by the government of Iraq
and its leader, I believe it is wrong for the United States to seek to over-throw
the regime of Saddam Hussein with military action. Morally, I oppose it because
I know a war with Iraq will have great consequences for the people of Iraq, who
have already suffered through years of war and economic sanctions. Further, I
believe it is detrimental to U.S. interests to take unilateral military action
when there is strong international support for weapons inspections, and when most
other governments oppose military action. I also believe that U.S. military action
at this time will further destabilize the region. I call upon members of our congregations
to be fervent in prayer, engaged in conversation with one another and with our
leaders. In the final analysis, we must stand unequivocally for peace. .
ELCA
Presiding Bishop Mark S. Hanson's Statement on Iraq Situation, August 30, 2002.
Mennonite
To speak against war and invasion is to hold up a conviction that, in light of
all uncertainties, peace and security are enlarged when authorities choose the
path of non-violent diplomacy. The concerns noted above convince us that this
is both a moral and a practical path. Our call is also a statement of belief that
God wills the path of peace and will work alongside those who have the courage
to take risks for peace.
Statement of the Mennonite Central Committee,
April 20, 2002
Methodist
United
Methodists have a particular duty to speak out against an unprovoked attack. President
Bush and Vice-President Cheney are members of our denomination. Our silence now
could be interpreted as tacit approval of war. Christ came to break old cycles
of revenge and violence. Too often, we have said we worship and follow Jesus but
have failed to change our ways. Jesus proved on the cross the failure of state-sponsored
revenge. It is inconceivable that Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior and the Prince
of Peace, would support this proposed attack.
Secretary Jim Winkler of
The United Methodist Church General Board of Church and Society, August 30, 2002
Presbyterian
We urge Presbyterians to oppose a precipitate U.S. attack on Iraq and the Bush
administration's new doctrine of pre-emptive military action. We call upon President
George W. Bush and other leaders to: Refrain from language that seems to label
certain individuals and nations as 'evil' and others as 'good'; Oppose ethnic
and religious stereotyping, Guard against a unilateralism, rooted in our unique
position of political, economic and military power, that perpetuates the perception
that 'might makes right'; Allow United Nations weapons inspections in Iraq, without
undue pressure or threats of pre-emptive, unilateral action; and End the economic
sanctions against Iraq, which have been ineffectual but have done untold damage
to the Iraqi people.
The General Assembly Council and the staff leadership
team of the Presbyterian Church (USA), September 28, 2002
Quaker
(Society of Friends)
We call upon Friends
to witness and work to prevent this war, to reverse this new military doctrine,
to call upon our governments to implement multilateral, diplomatic responses to
the threats posed by the government of Iraq, and to continue developing positive,
nonviolent approaches to resolving international conflicts. We know that there
are millions of people of good will with whom we can join in this work.
Joint
Statement in Response to Threat of War with Iraq from the General and Executive
Secretaries of Five Quaker Organizations, September 24, 2002
Unitarian
Universalist
We will not all stand in
the same place on this issue. But we can all stand in the same faith. Above all,
that is my hope. In these troubling days and all those that lie ahead, my deepest
prayer is that we stand in this faith with Universalist Olympia Brown, who wrote,
over one hundred years ago, "Every nation must learn that the people of all
nations are children of God, and must share the wealth of the world. You may say
this is impracticable, far away, can never be accomplished, but it is the work
we are appointed to do."
Responding to the Threat of War: A Pastoral
Letter from the Rev. William G. Sinkford, President, Unitarian Universalist Association,
September 20, 2002
United Church of Christ
With heavy hearts we hear once again the drumbeat of war against Iraq. As leaders
committed to God's reign of justice and peace in the world and to the just conduct
of our nation, we firmly oppose this advance to war. While Iraq's weapons potential
is uncertain, the death that would be inflicted on all sides in a war is certain.
Striking against Iraq now will not serve to prevent terrorism or defend our nation's
interests. We fear that war would only provoke greater regional instability and
lead to the mass destruction it is intended to prevent.
UCC leaders, September
13, 2002
Ecumenical
As Christians, we are concerned by the likely human costs of war with Iraq, particularly
for civilians. We are unconvinced that the gain for humanity would be proportionate
to the loss. Neither are we convinced that it has been publicly demonstrated that
all reasonable alternative means of containing Iraq's development of weapons of
mass destruction have been exhausted. We call upon our governments to pursue these
diplomatic means in active cooperation with the United Nations and to stop the
apparent rush to war.
World Council of Churches, August 30, 2002
Lutheran
(ELCA)
In recent days, leaders of the
United States government have talked openly about the possibility of a pre-emptive
strike against the government of Iraq and its leader, Saddam Hussein. As presiding
bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), I am deeply concerned
about any such action. In the 1995 ELCA social statement, "For Peace in God's
World," we said that, as Christians, "the love of our neighbor obligates
us to act to prevent wars and seek alternatives to them." This is a time
to stop the use of hostile rhetoric and verbal threats, and to focus again on
diplomacy.
While we are fully aware of the
potential threat posed by the government of Iraq and its leader, I believe it
is wrong for the United States to seek to over-throw the regime of Saddam Hussein
with military action. Morally, I oppose it because I know a war with Iraq will
have great consequences for the people of Iraq, who have already suffered through
years of war and economic sanctions. Further, I believe it is detrimental to U.S.
interests to take unilateral military action when there is strong international
support for weapons inspections, and when most other governments oppose military
action. I also believe that U.S. military action at this time will further destabilize
the region. I call upon members of our congregations to be fervent in prayer,
engaged in conversation with one another and with our leaders. In the final analysis,
we must stand unequivocally for peace. .
ELCA Presiding Bishop Mark S.
Hanson's Statement on Iraq Situation, August 30, 2002
_______________________________________________________
"We
have grasped the mystery of the atom and rejected the Sermon on the Mount. Ours
is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war than
we do about peacemore about killing than we do about living"
Omar
Bradley